The Spanish model of this put up could be consulted right here.

Rapper Pablo Hasel’s arrest after barricading himself within the rector’s constructing has provoked opinions in opposition to his imprisonment and even violent demonstrations.

For instance, The Guardian says: “Indignant phrases: rapper’s jailing exposes Spain’s free speech faultlines”.

Amnesty International collects signatures with the slogan: “Rapping just isn’t a criminal offense, take motion to alter the Penal Code and defend freedom of speech!”

Or, additionally, this one from The Parisian: “Spain: turbulent arrest of the rapper convicted for his tweets in opposition to the monarchy and the police”.

Now let’s go to what has occurred, which is defined very properly in this link from 20 Minutos:

1) The court docket’s first judgment in opposition to Hasel, from April 2014, sentenced him to 2 years of jail for glorification of terrorism, for some songs uploaded to YouTube by which he mentioned issues like the next:

He deserves to explode Patxi López’s automotive!”.

“It’s a mistake to not take heed to what I sing, like Terra Lliure [1] leaving Losantos alive”.

“I don’t really feel sorry on your shot at the back of the top pepero[2]…”

“The GRAPO[3] have been self-defense in opposition to imperialism and its crime”.

“Those that pull the strings deserve a thousand kilos of ammonia”.

“I consider bullets that Nazi judges’ necks attain”.

“Might the GRAPO return and convey you to your knees”.

The magistrates dominated out that these manifestations have been lined by the proper to freedom of expression, since in them “the discourse of hatred beats in a patent manner”. The sentence was suspended because it was the primary one.

2) However the identical 12 months 2014 he revealed the tune “Menti-Ros”, referring to the Mayor of Lérida Àngel Ros, the place he made demise threats in opposition to him. Though there was no criticism in court docket, the Prosecutor’s Workplace ordered to removethe video and, in response, Hasél revealed one other tune that led the court docket to shut his Fb profile.

3) In 2016 he assaulted a TV3 journalist within the workplace of the rector of the College of Lleida throughout a protest lock-in by professors and college students. For this aggression, in June 2020, he was sentenced to 6 months in jail and a compensation of 12,000 euros to the sufferer. This sentence just isn’t but last.

4) One other court docket in Lérida, in 2017, condemned him for one other assault, on this case on the unfavorable witness of a trial by which an agent of the Guarda Urbana who had been accused of assaulting a good friend of the rapper was acquitted. Hasél was sentenced to 2 and a half years in jail and fined 2,400 euros.

This sentence was confirmed yesterday, February 18, 2021, by the Courtroom of Lérida, in order that the sentence can be added to the one he’s now serving in jail, though the sentence just isn’t but last as it could possibly nonetheless be appealed to the Supreme Courtroom.

5) The Nationwide Courtroom, in September 2019, suspended the sentence talked about in paragraph 1) for Three years, as a result of it didn’t exceed two years the sentence and since he had no prior information, warning that if he reoffended, the sentence can be executed.

6) Certainly, in March 2018, the Nationwide Courtroom once more sentenced him, for different acts, for glorification of terrorism, in concurrence with insults to the Crown and the State Safety Forces, with aggravating circumstance of recidivism, to 2 years in jail and a effective of 23,400 euros. On this case it was about some Tweets by which have been contained, amongst others, messages of this tenor:

  • Juan Martín Luna, militant of the PCE(r), killed by the police for defending our rights.
  • The Bourbon mafioso partying with the Saudi monarchy, amongst those that finance the ISIS is every part.
  • The royal household are parasites.
  • The monarchy has legal enterprise like arms trafficking to Saudi Arabia.
  • The monarchy lives in luxurious on the expense of the exploitation and distress of others.
  • The Civil Guard, as even the European court docket has mentioned, has tortured.

The Supreme Courtroom, already in 2020, lowered this final sentence to 9 months in jail, as a result of ETA[4] and GRAPO to whom their messages referred have been now not energetic and had not been finishing up terrorist actions for a very long time. The conviction was for glorification of terrorism, insults and slander to the Crown and in opposition to the establishments of the State, arguing that freedom of speech just isn’t a “clean examine” and that hate speech can’t be protected.

The rapper appealed to the Constitutional Courtroom which, in November, didn’t admit the enchantment, because the particular constitutional transcendence had not been sufficiently argued.

In view of the details, we are able to ask ourselves the next questions, as jurists often say, of date regulation, that’s, considering the regulation in pressure nowadays:

Does Mr. Rivadulla (alias Hasél) enter jail as a result of he has been convicted for his expressions or for his aggressions?

Really, the origin of Hasél’s imprisonment lies in the truth that he has been convicted, on this final sentence -which in flip reactivates that of level 1)- for 2 offenses typified within the Penal Code.

On the one hand, the crime of glorification of terrorism, which punishes the expressions in several songs and tweets -some transcribed above- by which he justified and even praised the terrorist actions carried out by GRAPO and ETA. This crime is typified within the Penal Code with jail sentences of 1 to a few years. Hasél has been sentenced to 9 months in jail.

Then again, the crime of insult to the crown for various tweets and songs by which he mentioned issues like that the Infantas needs to be condemned to demise or that the King financed ISIS terrorism.

So, does Mr. Rivadulla go to jail for insulting the King?

No, insulting the King just isn’t punishable on this case (might be in others if they’re severe or slanderous) with a jail sentence, however with a financial effective. Due to this fact, Mr. Rivadulla has been sentenced to jail for glorifying ETA and GRAPO terrorism and never for insulting the King.

Insults are additionally a criminal offense when they’re directed in opposition to individuals and never solely in opposition to the Crown; the distinction between each crimes is that insults in opposition to individuals are crimes that may solely be denounced by the aggrieved individual and the penalties are a financial effective of six to 14 months; insults in opposition to the Crown are crimes that may be denounced by anybody and the financial penalties are increased, from six to twenty-four months.

However is it not true that if the sentence is lower than two years, no imprisonment is incurred?

Certainly, and this gentleman’s jail sentence has been set at 9 months, after a discount by the Supreme Courtroom. Nonetheless, and as already commented, Pablo Hasél has been sentenced as much as three extra occasions for various crimes; two of these sentences will not be but last and the opposite one was suspended on the situation that he didn’t reoffend. Since Pablo Hasél has reoffended and has been sentenced by a last judgment in 2020, the suspended sentence -the one defined in paragraph 1)- has been reactivated which entails his fast imprisonment.

Consequently, Mr. Hasél is condemned for his expressions and his subsequent conduct, in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation.

Now then, ought to the regulation be reformed to exclude, as requested by Amnesty Worldwide, the glorification of terrorism, insults to the Crown and different State establishments and non secular emotions?

These are already concerns of the passage, on which there’s room for all form of opinions. However there are some primary points that have to be taken into consideration. Within the first place, freedom of expression is a basic proper acknowledged in Article 19 of the Common Declaration of Human Rights and, in truth, is a basic pillar of any superior democracy, because it permits opinion to be fashioned, permitting data to move and the voters to be correctly fashioned with out restrictions. Furthermore, as Thomas I. Emerson mentioned, freedom of speech helps present a steadiness between stability and alter, because it acts as a “security valve” that enables individuals to let off steam when they’re in crucial moments that would make them susceptible to revolution.

Nonetheless, like every freedom or proper, which have to be interpreted broadly, it’s topic to limits, which have to be interpreted restrictively. Stuart Mill argues that the fullest freedom of speech is required to push arguments to their logical limits, moderately than the boundaries of social embarrassment; however he additionally launched what is called the hurt precept, understanding that such freedom ought to cease when it harms one other.

In fact, the dedication of what causes hurt to a different, slander, incites violence or insult relies on the social context, the historic second and even the viewers one is addressing. For instance, the crime of glorification of terrorism is now being known as into query as a result of, in contrast to apology, it doesn’t require such a selected incitement to commit a criminal offense (see here), which may result in extreme punishments. The second by which the expressions are pronounced can be essential and, in truth, the sentences take it into consideration, as a result of they contemplate that since ETA and GRAPO will not be operative, the references to them are much less severe. An essential circumstance shouldn’t be forgotten both, and that’s that the viewers to which the expressions are addressed is at the moment magnified by social networks and the simplest communications: no consequence would come up if such expressions had solely been heard by those that have attended an occasion paying for it.

Moreover, it needs to be taken into consideration that imprisonment doesn’t appear to make a lot sense to repress crimes associated to expressions that, in contrast to theft or others, can proceed to be dedicated from jail. Lastly, it’s unattainable for Prison Regulation, which needs to be the ultima ratio, to be dedicated to repressing any conduct that will trigger offense to a different individual. Democracy additionally consists of tolerating being “offended” by opinions or attitudes that displease us, as a result of it’s thought of that extra hurt is finished by repressing than by permitting, because the expression of concepts is what facilitates change and evolution.

Having made these nuances, it doesn’t appear to us that there shouldn’t be any legal repression for any expression, as a result of not defend sure aggressions to symbols, values or frequent reputations it signifies that they don’t seem to be such values or symbols. The place is the restrict? The restrict is in that time from which we’d not settle for these expressions referring to ourselves.

That’s the reason -we conclude with a political reflection- the political instrumentalization of this imprisonment by some leaders who contemplate, all on the similar time, that we’re not in a full democracy however that their place within the authorities is completely democratic; or that the media needs to be intervened or a reality fee needs to be created to prosecute hate crimes in opposition to minorities and, on the similar time, that there’s not sufficient freedom of data and expression; that there needs to be whole freedom to glorify terrorist teams and insult the King however they reject escraches and demonstrations in opposition to their individuals; that they advocate participatory democracy however don’t hesitate to incite violence when the regulation is utilized.

It’s tough to take care of a coalition authorities when one of many events desires to overthrow the system and tries to take action, now, from inside and promotes it outwards. It’s naive to assume that those that govern will take heed to us, however it’s clear that the disregard for the entire reality and incoherence can solely result in the state of affairs turning into increasingly untenable.

[1]Spanish terrorist group with Catalan pro-independence ideology.

[2]Pepero is used to discuss with those that vote for the PP, a Spanish liberal-conservative political occasion positioned between the center-right and the political proper.

[3]Spanish Antifascist terrorist group.

[4]Basque nationalist terrorist group


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here