Yesterday we learn an announcement from Wikipedia that stated:

«On July 5, 2018, the plenary of the European Parliament will vote whether or not to proceed with a proposal for a directive on copyright. This, if handed, would considerably harm the open Web we all know at the moment.

As an alternative of updating copyright legal guidelines in Europe and selling the participation of all residents within the data society, the directive would threaten on-line freedom and impose new filters, limitations and restrictions on accessing the Internet. If the proposal had been authorised in its present model, actions corresponding to sharing a information merchandise on social networks or accessing it by a search engine would turn into extra sophisticated on the Web; Wikipedia itself can be in danger.

To date, this proposal has been strongly opposed by dozens of related folks within the discipline of data know-how, together with the creator of the World Extensive Internet, Tim Berners-Lee, and the pioneer of the Web, Vinton Cerf. 169 lecturers, 145 organizations for human rights, freedom of the press, scientific analysis and technological improvement; and the Wikimedia Basis, the non-profit group that promotes, amongst different tasks free of charge information, this encyclopedia… ..

For these causes, the Spanish Wikipedia group has determined to darken all of the pages of the encyclopedia earlier than and throughout the vote on the textual content, that’s, till 10 a.m. (UTC) on July 5… ..

For extra details about the marketing campaign within the European Parliament and how you can act, go to You possibly can observe the communication on social networks with the tags #WikipediaSeApaga, #SalvemosInternet and #SaveYourInternet.«

This rule included initially two very conflicting articles, articles 11 and 13 have:

The article 11 generated a brand new 5-year proper, which allowed press publishers to authorize or prohibit on-line information aggregators (corresponding to Google Information) from reproducing their media publications, and resolve whether or not they wish to cost for it.

The article 13 regulated the storage and dissemination of customers’ content material for business functions, forcing platforms corresponding to YouTube to acquire licenses from copyright house owners and permitting any materials that allegedly violated copyright to be blocked earlier than publication

Effectively, after this assertion, which was actually a shame for democratic society at the moment, the European Parliament rejected the proposal: 318 votes in opposition to, 278 in favor and 31 abstentions. With this consequence #SalvemosInternet & #SaveYourInternet win the primary battle, however the textual content will return to the plenary session of the European Parliament in September, subsequently we can’t declare victory.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here